Sediment and Phosphorus Reductions in the Minnesota River and its Tributaries

by

Ananda Mallawatantri, David J. Mulla, and Mark Seeley

Dept. Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota


Contact Person : Dr. D. J. Mulla

Producers from the Minnesota River Agricultural Team (MNRAT), an advisory task force created by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), have been asking whether or not the improved land practices adopted by producers are improving the quality of water in the Minnesota River. The answer to this question has been difficult to provide because of the difficulty in separating climatic effects on erosion and flow from management effects.

Results from this study indicate that producers have reduced the amount of sediment and phosphorus entering the Minnesota River. Significant reductions in sediment and phosphorus loads were observed during the month of June from 1974-1994 after compensating for seasonal and annual variations in climate. The magnitudes of the reduction at the Minnesota River near St. Peter were an annual decrease of 2666 metric tons in total suspended solids (2.9%/yr reduction) and 3 metric tons of total phosphorus (1.5%/yr reduction). The majority of these reductions at St. Peter could be attributed to reductions in loading of total suspended solids and total phosphorus originating in the Blue Earth and Le Sueur watersheds. The increased adoption of conservation tillage practices in the Blue Earth and Le Sueur watersheds in comparison to adoption rates in other watersheds is at least partly responsible for reductions in sediment and phosphorus loadings.

Methods

The study analyzed monthly average total suspended solid (TSS) and total phosphorus (TP) loads during the months of March through August from 1974-1994 at the mouths of the Pomme de Terre, Chippewa, Yellow Medicine, Redwood, Cottonwood, Watonwan, Blue Earth (below its confluence with the Le Sueur and Watonwan rivers), and the Minnesota River at St. Peter (Fig. 1). Data for the study were obtained from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission.

The first step in the analysis was to separate the effects of climatic fluctuations on sediment or phosphorus load. The Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) was used as an indicator for changes in the water budget. PDSI values are widely used by climatologists to classify monthly climatic records according to the extent of moisture deficiency or excess due to patterns in precipitation, evapotranspiration, recharge, and runoff. PDSI values greater than 3 indicate very wet months, while PDSI values less than -3 indicate very dry months.

PDSI values were found to be correlated with monthly flow, and sediment or phosphorus load. Fig. 2 shows the relationship between PDSI, flow, and phosphorus load for the month of May between 1974 and 1994 at the sampling site located in the Blue Earth River near Mankato. It is apparent from Fig. 2 that the 80's and 90's have wetter climates than the late 60's and 70's. Linear regression between the PDSI and the logarithms of sediment or phosphorus load was used to model the effects of climate on sediment or phosphorus load.

The PDSI regression model for sediment or phosphorus load was subtracted from the monthly values of sediment or phosphorus load. The residuals from the model are the amounts of sediment or phosphorus load attributable mainly to non-climatic effects. Trends in these residuals were evaluated using a Mann-Kendall Tau statistical test, which is widely used by hydrologists to detect trends in long-term water quality monitoring data.

Results

Total Suspended Solids

Trend analysis of raw monthly data before removing climatic effects showed significant increases in TSS loading for all study sites from March to August. Typical of these are results for June, shown in Table 1 and Fig. 3. Annual increases during June ranged from 3,086 metric t/yr in the Minnesota River at St. Peter (3.3%/yr of median load) to 6 t/yr in the Pomme de Terre watershed (1.3%/yr increase in median load). Particularly large annual increases in load (between 8.1 and 9.7%/yr) were observed for tributaries draining the Coteau region, namely; the Yellow Medicine, Redwood, and Cottonwood watersheds.

Table 1. TSS Load and Trends in the Minnesota River and its Tributaries (June 1974-94).




Total Suspended Solids Load
Trend in Load

Median Load
Raw Data
w/o Climatic Effects
Location
t/mo
t/yr
%/yr
t/yr
%/yr
Pomme de Terre
471
6
1.3
-8
-0.3
Chippewa
3,470
157
4.5
44
1.3
Yellow Medicine
2,861
279
9.7
82
2.9
Redwood
1,357
110
8.1
27
2.0
Cottonwood
10,004
884
8.8
305
3.0
Watonwan
3,789
261
6.9
-40
-1.1
Greater Blue Earth*
48,373
1,201
2.5
-2,215
-4.6
Minnesota River+
92,231
3,086
3.3
-2,666
-2.9

* Monitored downstream of confluence between the Blue Earth, Watonwan, and Le Sueur rivers.

+ Monitored near St. Peter.

After removing climatic effects (Fig. 4), trend analysis showed generally small annual changes in all months except June. The differences in annual change before and after removing climatic effects were striking (Table 1, Fig. 3 and Fig. 4). Most of the apparent increases in loading which have occurred since 1974 can be explained by increasingly wetter climatic patterns in the last decade.

During June, trend analysis after removal of climatic effects showed annual increases in TSS loading of from 1.3 to 3.0% for the Chippewa, Yellow Medicine, Redwood, and Cottonwood watersheds. Small decreases in TSS loading were observed in the Pomme de Terre and Watonwan watersheds. Substantial annual decreases in TSS loading (-4.6%/yr) were observed in the Blue Earth watershed downstream of its confluence with the Le Sueur and Watonwan rivers. Since the decreases for the Watonwan watershed were not as great, it appears that most of the reductions in TSS loading from the greater Blue Earth watershed are occurring in the upper Blue Earth and Le Sueur watersheds.

After removal of climatic effects, significant reductions in TSS load were observed in the Minnesota River near St. Peter (Table 1, Fig. 4). The annual magnitude of these reductions was 2,666 t/yr, which is a reduction of roughly 2.9%/yr relative to the median load of the Minnesota River in June. The reduction in the Minnesota River is slightly greater than the annual reduction which occurs in the Blue Earth and Le Sueur watersheds (2,215 t/yr). Thus, it appears that the bulk of the improvement in the Minnesota River can be attributed to reductions in TSS originating in the Blue Earth and Le Sueur watersheds.

To understand why the reductions in TSS loading occur mainly in the Blue Earth and Le Sueur watersheds, it is instructive to review the results of the 1995 crop residue transect survey conducted by the NRCS. This survey includes data for the percent of cropped land in each major watershed of the Minnesota River basin having more than 15% of the soil surface covered by crop residue after soybeans (Table 2).

Table 2. Percent of land with corn planted after soybeans having greater than 15% crop residue.

Watershed
% Land with > 15% soybean residue
Pomme de Terre
27%
Chippewa
14%
Yellow Medicine
12%
Redwood
17%
Cottonwood
31%
Watonwan
46%
Upper Blue Earth
31%
Le Sueur
48%

Results from the 1995 crop residue survey show that the watersheds with the greatest percentage of land managed by conservation tillage are the Le Sueur, Watonwan, Pomme de Terre, and Blue Earth watersheds. From Table 1, these are also the watersheds showing reductions in loading of TSS after removal of climatic effects. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that reductions in loading of TSS are partly attributable to increased adoption of conservation tillage. Other improved land management practices have been implemented over the last 20 years, including early spring planting of crop and enrollment of land in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP).

Total Phosphorus

Results of the trend analysis for total phosphorus are quite consistent with the results for total suspended solids. Trend analysis of raw data prior to removal of climatic effects (Table 3, Fig. 3) showed significant increases in phosphorus loading for all months. The largest percentage annual increases in raw data occurred for the Yellow Medicine, Cottonwood, and Watonwan watersheds. After removal of climatic effects, trend analysis showed significant reductions for phosphorus loading only during the month of June (Table 3, Fig. 4).

Table 3: TP Loads and Trends in the Minnesota River and its Tributaries (June 1974-94).

Total Phosphorus Loads


Trend in Load

Median Load
Raw Data
w/o Climatic Effects
Location
t/mo
t/yr
%/yr
t/yr
%/yr
Pomme de Terre
2.4
0.02
0.8
-0.08
-3.3
Chippewa
11.0
0.5
4.2
0.1
1.4
Yellow Medicine
7.0
0.6
9.1
0.2
2.9
Redwood
6.4
7.6
0.5
0.1
1.5
cottonwood
16.0
1.4
8.9
0.5
3.2
Watonwan
11.6
0.8
6.9
0.06
0.5
Greater Blue Earth*
95.8
2.4
2.5
-3.7
-3.8
Minnesota River+
201.1
6.8
3.4
-3.0
-1.5

*Monitored downstream of confluence between the Blue Earth, Watonwan, and Le Sueur rivers.

+ Monitored near St. Peter.

After removing climatic effects, trend analysis for the month of June showed annual reductions in total phosphorus loadings of 3.0 metric tons in the Minnesota River at St. Peter, an annual reduction of 1.5%. Reductions in June were also observed for the greater Blue Earth watershed and the Pomme de Terre watershed. The reductions from the greater Blue Earth watershed were 3.7 t/yr, which is an annual decrease of 3.8%. Because the loadings of total phosphorus from the Watonwan watershed did not change significantly over time, the reductions in phosphorus loading from the greater Blue Earth watershed can be attributed to changes occurring in the upper Blue Earth and Le Sueur watersheds. As noted in Table 2, these changes include increased adoption of conservation tillage, which is probably partly responsible for reductions in phosphorus loading from the Blue Earth and Le Sueur watersheds.

Summary

An increasingly wetter climate in the last few decades has masked reductions in delivery of sediment and phosphorus to the Minnesota River due to improved crop and land management practices. While the wetter climate has actually increased sediment and phosphorus loads due to more frequent erosion-causing rainstorm events, producers have adopted better crop and land management practices that reduce erosion. These practices include earlier crop planting dates, conservation tillage, and cropland retirement (CRP). The effectiveness of erosion control practices in reducing sediment and phosphorus loads in the Minnesota River appears to be greatest during June, when both crop canopy growth and conservation practices provide dual protection for the soil surface.

After compensating for climatic effects, significant reductions in sediment and phosphorus loads were observed in the Minnesota River only during June. The main contributors to these reductions were the upper Blue Earth and Le Sueur watersheds. Most other watersheds showed small increases in phosphorus and sediment loading during June after removal of climatic effects. In most cases, these increases were in watersheds having low rates of adoption for conservation tillage.

The results of this study show the importance of promoting adoption of conservation tillage. There is a great variation in the adoption rates for improved soil conservation practices throughout the Minnesota River basin. For instance, in 1995 the percent of county acres with corn planted into 15% surface residue cover ranges from 6 to 51% with an average of 28%. Clearly, increased adoption of soil conservation practices can further accelerate the reduction in sediment loads to the Minnesota River. Efforts to accelerate the adoption of conservation practices should focus first on the most erodible land (Fig. 5) and the steep lands near rivers (Fig. 6).

Our previous report on pollutant loadings from major watersheds of the Minnesota River basin noted that two-thirds of the sediment and phosphorus in the Minnesota River at Fort Snelling was produced in the Lower Minnesota, Le Sueur, and upper Blue Earth watersheds. Based on these findings, and the significant reductions in sediment and phosphorus loadings in the Le Sueur and upper Blue Earth watersheds, we recommend focussing greater attention on reducing sediment and phosphorus loads from the Lower Minnesota watershed, while continuing efforts to reduce loads from the Blue Earth and Le Sueur watersheds.